worked on it since 1998

  • Blaad@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Ngl gimp never took off because it’s UX is terrible, plus it’s far from feature complete.

    It’s like freecadbin that regard, it exists, it’s foss, but it’s massively inferior to the paid options because UX is horrible and it breaks in weird ways.

    Foss can be as good or better than non foss, just look at blender or Kicad, but these two aren’t it.

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It was made by a programmer who does not understand anything about how professional imaging people use software. It would be like an artist to somehow manages to cobble together some kind of crudely functional IDE, but he’s never programmed in his life and he doesn’t even know what programming really is.

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          40 minutes ago

          Cuck coders don’t need any IDEs though, they can sit with a WebUI. I think that made them insecure though so now they have resorted to flashy TUIs instead, so they can feel like 1337 pr0 h4xx0r or whatever.

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Freecad is NOT like gimp. They are not hell bent o forcing people to do things their way. They constantly evolve, and pay real attention to what the community wants. They are one of FOSS’ example of how things should be. I really like it and how it’s evolving.

    • naught101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Gimp ux was bad. It’s been fine for years.

      Freecad is WAY newer, and has had a fraction of the developer time spent on it.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        “Fine” meaning “it’s technically possible to use it.”

        Adding and editing text is a nightmare. I feel like the only way you could say with a straight face is if you haven’t used Photoshop since 2006. Hell, PowerPoint has a better interface in a lot of ways.

        I hate dunking on them like that but let’s not lie to ourselves here. GIMP is good enough but the UI was clearly made by engineers, not artists

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Adding and editing text is a nightmare. I feel like the only way you could say with a straight face is if you haven’t used Photoshop since 2006. Hell, PowerPoint has a better interface in a lot of ways.

          In GIMP? You select the text tool, you click it on the canvas. It’s that simple.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            10 hours ago

            That’s fair. I’m an engineer, too, and the UI brings me pain. Especially because my previous career had creative cloud as the daily software.

            I guess I meant more the engineer mindset of “I already know how to use it so it’s good enough”

            It reminds me of AutoCAD, my current daily software, which feels like a thousand bandaids stacked on top of each other over the course of 25 years.

            I feel obligated to say that having a bad UI doesn’t mean it’s bad software. I’m just tired of people pretending it’s polished lol

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        14 hours ago

        And CAD is ridiculously complex. Students also practice like half a year to cope with the proprietary market leaders. I sometimes think people complain because they confuse tools made for professionals with some game on easy mode.

        But yeah, FreeCAD also isn’t on par with professional tools. It’s surprisingly capable and has a lot of features. And they made it crash way less. 2 years ago it used to crash several times each project when adding some chamfers or some other easy stuff and I had to do lots of stuff in order or it wouldn’t work. As of now I’d say it’s perfectly usable for the average hobby project. Just don’t expect any CAD software to be usable without any kind of background knowledge. There’s other tools for that kind of 3D design.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          FreeCAD still fucks up with chamfers with annoying regularity unless you’re really careful. That being said, it doesn’t crash from it anymore.

          That being said, their workflow is way better now. It used to be that you were expected to remember exact locations of vertices, so it was about 20 years of regression from where most other CAD packages were at the time. Now it’s purely graphical and you can actually connect features properly

      • Blaad@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’ve spent 3 years learning freecad, and it’s bad, it’s entirely incapable of holding up against moderately complex projects, a simple fillet can break the whole model. It got better with 1.0 but it’s still so very far from competing with fusion or inventor / catia…

        As for gimp… I’ve really tried adding it to my workflow, but it’s been a massive headache, I’d likely use photocraft over it given both options…

    • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I tried the “good UX” one back then when people hype around the update, and it still really hard to learn if you used to photoshop layout. These day, Krita is better i think, and Inkscape for the Illustrator alternative.

      • kazerniel@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Inkscape’s UI is very unintuitive to me, as someone used to Illustrator. The necessary tools mostly exist, but not where I would look for them.

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          42 minutes ago

          Krita’s brush engine is also stellar. Easily up there among the best of them.

    • Asetru@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      bashes gimp for its ui

      uses blender as a positive example in that regard

      Uh.

      • TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’d say that Photoshop UI is more streamlined than GIMPs in several ways. In how it handles selections and layers and filter application, etc. And, it’s not just familiarity. GIMP is clunky.

        Whereas Blender compared to Rhino, or Maya, or Sketchup, or Solidworks--there is no one way to do 3D that works better than another. Moving from one to the other, you can only take the basic concepts of a mesh between them, how they get there is all over the map.

        • Asetru@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Hey, cool! I’m happy that it works for you!

          Doesn’t for me though. I’ll just stick to my cycle of waiting five-ish years, trying it again to see if they fixed their crap and then binning it again.

      • Blaad@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Blender is not that bad, not even close in fact. Have you tried learning it at all? I know I have and per hour spent it’s far more empowering than other comparatively complex software.

        You can’t compare a 2d picture editor to a full 3d modeling suite like they’re even remotely close. Blender is better.

        • Asetru@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yes, I did try it. I also know my way around other 3d software and blender’s horrible ux has consistently driven me away from it.

          And I know that 2d and 3d software packages are different. Duh. Doesn’t mean 3d software has to be bad though.

        • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Blender is horrendous. And that’s comparing it to other 3d modelling programs. They throw like 8 different subsystems’ UIs onto the screen at once. If I’m trying to model an object, I don’t the damn animation timeline taking up half my screen.

          • Leon@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            41 minutes ago

            Then remove it. It’s there because it is used for certain things, like physics simulation. If you need to do hair or cloth, then the timeline is used.