• WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I agree with most of his points, but there is something about his delivery that I find a little obnoxious. I’m not sure he is going to effectively change people’s minds as much as he just appeals to the intellectual liberal crowd.

      • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I try to avoid them as much as possible, usually.

        I’m not saying he’s unusual for a 13 year old, just that writing articles about him like he’s a progressive silver bullet seems to be off the mark.

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Well, yeah, but that was the “problem” with greta thunberg as well. And even if the person delivering the message is perfect and can’t be downplayed for any aspect of their appearance or delivery, maga just has to talk in a high pitched sarcastic voice that 'LibEraLs aLwaYs wAnt SucH StUpid THings!"

      • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        In my opinion, part of that attitude is a valid criticism. Republicans are good at constructing messages that appeal to the emotional and instinctual parts of the brain. A lot of democrats have been stuck in a pattern of indignation and admonishing, which is what I detect in this kids videos.

        If you look at the last two promising progressive campaigns, they were ones that also figured out how to appeal to emotionality. Obama overcame a major establishment competitor with Hope, Change, and pop art. Bernie did better than any leftist has ever done by focusing on a battle against the elites that must be waged before it is too late.

        It seems like the rallying cry is more effective for swing voters and nonvoters than intellectual outrage is.

        • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yep. The highest point of harris’ campaign was when walz got the ‘weird’ bit going. We (humanity) has to face the fact that we are mostly dumb, panicky animals that logic touches but doesn’t often guide.

        • Feyd@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          What Republicans are good at is having a propaganda outlet lying to everyone that watches it for 30 years and is treated even by opponents as if it is a news source.

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 hours ago

            The Conservative Propaganda Machine.

            It’s not just Fox News, it’s an entire network of interconnected Conservative media outlets, from radio, to print, to Internet, to TV.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Ok but a big part of how that works is by convincing people that their emotional arguments are rational and that their opponents’ rational arguments are condescension and moral arguments are emotional

    • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Color me not impressed. It’s just a bunch of surface level opinions I could rip off an hour of scrolling Lemmy comments, delivered in whiny kid voice. Clearly, anyone can spout off opinions.

      The real magic happens when you have opinions, backed up with research, facts, & sources, you hear the other side, and you can defend your opinions logically & well.

      Whatever this is…it isn’t that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯