Opponents say [Washington state] voters were persuaded at least partly because the initiative and its boosters exploited deep-seated prejudices and misunderstandings about transgender people to erode their rights.

  • Phanlix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Lol you keep saying it’s ‘my feelings’. It’s not. For the final time. My degree is in Excercise Science. The field’s opinion on that is lean muscle mass is the best predictor for athletic performance, period. And this politically biased study says that it doesn’t matter, but offers ZERO explanation for why they say something that definitely is NOT the scientific consensus. Which definitely makes me mistrust the study, kind of a lot, if you can point out where they explain why lean muscle was not considered to be important, please feel free. But honestly, that’s like saying the sky is green. Now, clearly your feelings are hurt and you’re a fanatic who can’t hear anything other than what they want to, so good day.

    Also, if this thread is indicitive of how trans supporters act, and their general thoughts on the science behind the topic, maybe I was very wrong to have supported trans issues. Definitely food for thought for me today.

      • Phanlix@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Conclusion While transgender women exhibited higher lean mass than cisgender women, their physical fitness was comparable. Current evidence is mostly low certainty and has heterogenous quality but does not support theories of inherent athletic advantages for transgender women over cisgender.

        Lol who can’t read again?

        Jesus Christ yeah I’m done with transgender support on any level after you. If this is the level of intellectual honesty and scientific literacy I can expect.

        • Cherries@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Do you believe a SMD of 0.19 with a 95%CI that includes 0 to be a significant difference? If so, your degree is a useless piece of paper and you did not learn anything in college, probably because you can’t read.

          • Phanlix@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I 100% do, especially when combined with the structural differences in musculo-skeletal connections and tissue that this study but others have measured. If a doping/cheating method provided similar results, it would be banned from the sport, fuck they banned certain swimsuits over less.

            This also doesn’t address at all the ability of trans men to metabolize testosterone quicker allowing them to more effectively hide steroid use and doping.

            Yep, you’ve 100% convinced me that this argument you’re presenting is not about the facts at all but about your feelings.

            • Cherries@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              When you say “they banned swimsuits” or “it would be banned”, you are talking about sports leagues making decisions on sports. We are talking about the government deciding who can and cannot play sports. I do not understand why you want the government to decide who can participate in sports, no matter how strongly you feel about your hobby.

              In regards to the science, since you seemingly wasted your time at college, let me explain what 5 min of Google revealed. SMD is Standardized Mean Difference, which is how much difference there is between two groups. An SMD of .19 is statisically insignificant. The minimum bound for statistically insignificant is actually .2, so the difference in lean muscle that you love spouting on about is even less than noticable. The 95%CI is a measurement of how much overlap there is between two groups. If the range includes zero, then the two groups overlap each other so much that if you were to chart them on a graph, they’d be centered in mostly the same place. A 95%CI with ranges -.14 to .53 means there is significant overlap between the two groups, with the data suggesting that some trans women might have a little more lean muscle than cis women, but overall, most trans women have a similar amount of lean muscle to cis women.

              If I were to make a conclusion about this, I would say that the vast majority of trans women athletes do not exhibit significant differences in lean muscle when compared to cis women. If there is any uncertainty, that is because there are so few trans women athletes to analyze, but none of the currently availble data would suggest trans women hold any biological advantages over cis women.

              It is truly incredible that my 5 minutes of Google educated me past your degree in Exercise Science.

              • Phanlix@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                It is truly incredible that you believe 5min on google beats a degree, but that is the state of the world today, and shows your level of intellectual honesty. This is how facebook anti-vaxxing moms do things after all.

                • Cherries@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Where’s your data science boy? Where’s your research and numbers Mr. Exercise? All throughout our interaction, I seem to be the only one using facts and figures while you harp on and on about your feelings and beliefs.

                  • Phanlix@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Aw, you mad bro? Yeah this isn’t about your feelings at all is it.

                    We’ve been talking over the same study for like 10 comments, I can tell by your reading level you’re not capable of understanding that because of my educational and professional background I have some differing opinions on the conclusions of those involved with the study, and I’m allowed to. Thankfully voters agreed with me more, and those same leagues you want to dictate things have pretty universally applied anti-trans rules. So I think despite you whining and crying about what you want, you’re not gonna get it.