• Federal Reserve Board Governor Lisa Cook sued to challenge her removal by President Donald Trump.
  • Trump said Monday that he was firing Cook because of allegations that she committed mortgage fraud.
  • Critics say that the move undermines the independence of the Fed, which sets key interest rates that affect mortgage rates and other debt rates.

I’ll note that the Supreme Court previously required that all firings of federal reserve officials by the President be for cause. So he had one of his henchmen cook up allegations, but couldn’t get an indictment for them, and wants to fire her over them just because.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    Choose one:

    • Economy is doing great and interest rates need to remain high.
    • Economy is not doing great or is in danger of doing worse and interest rates need to drop.
    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      There is a third option!

      Economy isn’t doing great and facing inflationary pressure due to tariffs and trade wars, force rates to lower for a short boost only to cause more inflation and weakening dollar!

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Sorta, typically we think of raising/lowering interest rates to combat macroeconomic issues. Raising rates cools an overzealous economy, lowering rates fires up a slow economy.

          However, we have a slowing economy with hot/rising prices. Either way you move rates you’ll likely end up exacerbating one of those issues. So the knee jerk reaction to lower rates could backfire.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          IMO the difference is that it’s blatently self-serving and doesn’t even pretend to be concerned with the long-term health of the economy.

  • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    Make no mistake, this is a dress rehearsal for firing Powell. Trump is testing what he can do with the “for cause” language. If the Supreme Court is deferential, and willing to accept a broad definition of “for cause” and defer to the president to determine exactly what “cause” is sufficient to justify firing a Fed governor, you can 100% assume that firing Powell for “cause” relating to his remodel of the Fed buildings. In addition, if this firing sticks, Trump will end up with 4 of 7 Board of Governors appointees.

    • Redfugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      If this firing sticks there is no need to fire Powell, he’ll likely not be reappointed next May.

      • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        His term as Fed Chair ends in May 2026. He’ll still be a voting governor when his chairmanship ends.

        • Redfugee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yes, but if this firing sticks and another fed governor is appointed, the administration will have a majority (4/7) to oust Powell next term.