Something something “narco terrorist”

  • UnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Neither.

    The reason I use the general term libertarian is because if I called myself a consenualist nobody would know what that means. After all I’m the creator and sole adherent of the school of thought.

    I think the “left” & the “right” are equally insufferable. I’m tired of both of them constantly trying to police everything. (My use of the snek flag included)

    • compostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Lol ok

      I’m not here to tell you what to believe, but the Gadsden flag is pretty closely associated with right-wing American libertarianism. If you want to keep using it, go right ahead, just don’t be surprised when that’s what people assume you stand for

        • compostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          You’ll be incorrect, and people will think you don’t know what you’re talking about as a result, but you’re certainly welcome to do that.

        • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          you understand how this is absolutely silly, right?

          the equivalent to your situation is not calling all socialists nazis, because “see nazis had ‘socialist’ in their name”.

          an equivalant would be to assume that someone who calls themselves a communist, and uses the flag of the soviet union or china, is indeed authoritarian (or maybe just very misinformed or edgy?), when they really are their own new kind of communist, who rejects all other communists and who uses the flag and name because they “just like the aestetic” and want to “reclaim it from the authoritarians”.

          i think it should be clear how the assumtion is in one case unjustified and either born out of ignorance or malice, and in the other case the only possible assumtion to make, untill the communist in question provides additional information.

          now consider that many here probably experiance right libertarians a threat to their own safety and freedom, in their actual lives, and you might understand why they might not give people using the symbolism of right libertarianism much benefit of the doubt.

          • UnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah… The silliness was the literal point.

            Actually it’s a 1:1 comparison

            The word “socialism” was co-opted The word “libertarian” was co-opted

            If you assume all libertarians must be those who co-opted the term, then I assume all socialists are those who co-opted the term.

            But whatever. Echo chamber going to echo.

            • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              it’s not about the word “libertarian”. its about the flag (in combination with the word). the flag was not coopted to be a right libertarian thing, it has always been. you cant reclaim that. if you want to reclaim the word “libertarian” it’s probably smarter to disassociate it from right libertarian symbolism