Still investigating cause of death, but it appears to be some sort of puncture wound in the neck region
It is amazing that Trump sacrifices his personal Joseph Göbbels just to distract from the Epstein files.
Send up the Bat signal! The pod cast bros running the FBI don’t have a fucking CLUE.
I think it was an accident. He dropped the rifle and it accidentally shot Kirk
Both wrong. Staged. Fake. You’re fools for believing it.
Yeah, his neck just did that
The “nearby woods” have been secured, lol. Yeah, you do that. Watch out for the deer and bears and shit.
Well, they had to say they’ve done something.
In a month or two theyll pin it on someone, mangione style. Just to keep COG; the perception that there os punishment is more important than actually solving the mystery. I’d guess someone less pretty and less sympathetic this time. Maaaaaybe someone queer.
Actually, anisotropic conductive film is used to keep chip on glass and provide the electrical connection, plus it may be covered in resin or epoxy.
FAR too many “coincidences” for this to not have been an inside job.
The weird pre-prepared AI video of Trump announcing his death
The plane randomly arriving and likely picking the shooter up
The shooter being clearly an expert marksman
The right all coordinating to declare a civil war within seconds of it happening
The FBI conveniently not being able to find the guy
Not 1 but 2 plants in the crowd to distract authorities
Etc etc etc.
Release the Epstein files you orange pedophile piece of shit.
What’s the story with plane and the plants in the crowd?
A private jet at a close by airport took off at about enough time for the shooter to hop on board and escape. It unexplainably disappeared off radar as it crossed into Arizona, then it came back an hour later.
As for the plant, the old guy they first arrested was claiming he shot Kirk.
https://www.sltrib.com/news/2025/09/10/george-zinn-what-we-know-about-man/
What’s up with the AI thing? Are we veering off into QAnon territory or is something looking particularly fishy?
There’s nothing conspiratorial about it.
Trump’s video announcing the death of Charlie Kirk is clearly AI.
His hands change size and barely move
His entire body and head is far too stiff and moves unnaturally
The video itself seems off, as if its missing detail loke any AI vids do
His voice is unusually monotoned, even for his “serious” voice
Almost none of his typical Trumpisms like fucking up his words, slurring his words nor going off on a tangent were there
And, of course, just today at the 9/11 memorial event his right side of his face is drooping.
I wonder how long they’ll get away with weekend at burniesing trump with ai bs when he dies Stalin style and the admin are flailing
Here’s a video of Trump today https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/comments/1neg8de/trumps_face_appeared_noticeably_drooped_on_one/
Here’s a video of him yesterday. https://x.com/disclosetv/status/1965940221612273913/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1965940221612273913¤tTweetUser=disclosetv
In the second video, there’s even a weird glitch at about 18 seconds, where he says “Charlie was a patriot” and if you look over his head there’s like a shift or something that is noticeable.
I noticed this yesterday, I think its at least edited, but seeing him today…he does not look quite as feisty as usual. Its not worth spending time on, proving that a video was faked is not exactly the most pressing issue of our time. But I think there’s merit to the claim
Somethings real weird about that video, the reflections on the desk seem really off.
On the left it looks like a normal reflection until it meets the red/white stripes and zigzags them, on the right things get even weirder the reflection of the phone cable looks completely mirrored upside down, the flags and curtains dont add up.
Weirdest of all directly under trumps left elbow looks to be the small gold framed picture on the very right mirrored horizontally
My guess is this is green screened and AI edited, pretty creepy
deleted by creator
No, people just don’t understand interpolation.
And Trump was notably more focused and on message than usual.
So Trump’s gonna send NG troops to Utah right? The crime in these red states is really out of control.
For real. One dork gets beat up in DC, and here comes martial law.
Well to be fair; this was a deepstate deepfake false flag with a crowd full of crisis actors. Kirk actually got cosmetic surgery to have a normal size face and is living out his live on some island with a sweet pension.
So, my aunt was there and said she was in charge of securing the trees. Said the trees in front of the student union only took 3 hours to secure.
Can someone explain this? I don’t understand
but the nearby woods have been secured, authorities said.
It’s a joke about securing (the trees in) the woods.
LOL hilarious! Trying to fool AI into thinking that trees don’t actually need securing when everyone knows those things are basically evil and they live everywhere!
This might be a domestication attempt, it is still technically securing the tree, but it is more about controlling its growth and less about stopping those bastard ass wild trees from getting their limbs on rifles and shooting nazis in the neck.
Wild, I was pretty sure his neck just did that.
Gosh you mean someone executed a perfectly aimed shot into his carotid and picked him off like a clay pigeon in a shooting gallery, escaped a security patrolled event without being identified, and you think that might not be just some rando? Wow FBI that’s some stellar detective work!
Look, the only qualifications now are loyalty to the party, so they might not be the sharpest, but at least they have a job, in this economy? Who could blame them for just vibing
The Kash Patel special
What was the theory before? Crime of passion, gun and run?
Like he just had a “say what again” moment to that bullshit Kirk was saying on stage?
“Let me just clean my rifle on the roof of this school building, what could go… OH FUCK!”
Like MSNBC saying it could have been one of his supporters celebrating
Like some guy doing a Yosemite Sam and just jumping around with guns?
My theory is that trump literally sacrificed him for several reasons.
- Shore up the base who was being lost due to Epstein/bankruptcy by giving a clear enemy (the left, who definitely did this, because they are mean)
- Cause a massive distraction to the Epstein files
- Give ample cover to crack down on political enemies with ease
- Get rid of Charlie Kirk. I mean what a d-bag. No one liked him.
It would explain how Trump had that tweet ready so quickly.
What if the gunman was Kirk’s estranged gay lover? That’s my theory
Man that was a real story about a gangster rapper.
The more likely explanation is that it was the ghost of John Wilkes Booth.
it sure as hell was not random.
The blood shooting from Mr. Kirks neck alone was not good enough evidence to determine if the shooter hit what he was targeting. Great work FBI. At this rate, you’ll soon be able to confirm the shooter used a gun.
His neck just did that.
TBF the laws in the USA are wack enough that the weapon might not fall under the definition of deadly weapon and therefore firearms related crime.
Better still:
Mr Kirk was on his “Prove me Wrong” tour.
And the assassin chose to prove Mr Kirk wrong in a way words couldn’t.
However - If spending money can legally be protected as “free speech” in the US, then what other actions could be considered “free speech” and therefore is protected under the first amendment?
If Mr Kirk was openly asking to be proven wrong, then couldn’t the assassins bullet be protected under free speech as a clear (but violent) answer to that question?
As a friend I’m saying it’s time to drop out of law school.
The MAGA appointed judge that’s doing absolutely everything chat gpt suggests might be buying that argument, you never can tell.
Not in law school 😂
But as an American, how is money coming from a political donation legally protected free speech?
Since I’m not a lawyer, and I assume you are, please walk me through how that concept, legally, makes more sense than a bullet coming from a gun being considered free speech in a “Prove me Wrong” tour about gun violence.
Honestly, no antogonization intended, I would earnestly love to hear an actual lawyers take on the differences between these two concepts.
Because from my perspective: both are genuinely poorly reasoned when it comes to the first amendment and free speech, yet one is actually legal.
Would love to know why that is.
Targeted by feds as a false flag. And by feds I don’t mean all fed, I mean corrupt ones. They kind that manipulate regular people to do crazy shit.
