UnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 days agoRulepiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square42linkfedilinkarrow-up1752arrow-down119
arrow-up1733arrow-down1imageRulepiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneUnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square42linkfedilink
minus-squaredanh2os@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down5·3 days agohttps://fandomwire.com/jk-rowling-clears-air-on-her-relationship-with-jeffrey-epstein-after-alleged-leaked-emails/
minus-squarekaty ✨@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoa paedophile who has launched a campaign to genocide trans children for years pinky swearing she isn’t a paedophile isn’t really “clearing the air”
minus-squareɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·2 days agoShe “clears air” simply with this tweet: This is beyond silly. Neither I, nor anybody on my team, ever met, communicated with or invited Jeffrey Epstein to anything. (The rest of the article is just irrelevant context to make it longer.) Neither informative nor particularly convincing.
minus-squareGrail@multiverse.soulism.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·2 days agoUntil now I was kinda hesitant about the “she’s in the Epstein files” line because it was her staff who invited him. But now that she’s covering for her staff, I’m all in. She’s lying about her relationship to Epstein and that makes her look guilty AF.
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·2 days agoOh well if she said she didn’t then must be true!
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 days ago She says she has no basis in reality. I agree with that, but what slop is this?
https://fandomwire.com/jk-rowling-clears-air-on-her-relationship-with-jeffrey-epstein-after-alleged-leaked-emails/
a paedophile who has launched a campaign to genocide trans children for years pinky swearing she isn’t a paedophile isn’t really “clearing the air”
She “clears air” simply with this tweet:
(The rest of the article is just irrelevant context to make it longer.)
Neither informative nor particularly convincing.
Until now I was kinda hesitant about the “she’s in the Epstein files” line because it was her staff who invited him.
But now that she’s covering for her staff, I’m all in. She’s lying about her relationship to Epstein and that makes her look guilty AF.
Oh well if she said she didn’t then must be true!
I agree with that, but what slop is this?