• mushroommunk@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Enough are doing it that it’s still profitable. Last estimates I saw were 10% who saw an ad clicked one, and 10% of those who clicked bought what they saw

      • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s actually been dropping over time. It used to be more like 10%, now I see some people celebrating 0.4% conversation rate. What’s also been happening in conjunction is the cost has dropped. On like Facebook and stuff now you can serve like 1000 impressions for like $5 or something. I don’t know exact numbers on cost there but stupid low like 0.10¢ per clicked ad.

        • ignirtoq@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Across a lot of media, impressions are so cheap now they don’t even charge for them, just the clicks cost (“CPC” is the charge type, “cost per click”). They track impressions to give advertisers metrics on conversion rates, but they don’t charge for them.

      • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The terms you want to search of you’re curious “Click through Rate” and “Conversion Rate”. It’s actually been falling over time as people get more and more used to ignoring ads or using ad blockers. They vary some for type of product and location of ad (fantasy novels on a book blog are likely to be higher, drop ship Amazon stuff on Facebook are likely to be lower), but yeah, not super high.

        • foodandart@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The thing is, I do not honestly object to ads - the internet has got to be paid for somehow

          My objection is the way that ads are served. It’s the creepy stalking users far and wide across the web that irks me.

          This targeted bullshit. No, no and NO!

          I’m more likely when I am on any given site - to check out an ad that is discrete, static and embedded and shows up regardless of the ad blocker I use.

          That is different.

          At that point, I’m seeing something that another person or business that runs the site has made a decision to advertise, it may be a product or service they like and use.

          The rest of it though… can rot.

          • banazir@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Back in the day you could catch malware from online ads. And the pop-ups, the damn pop-ups, so annoying. For me, the final straw was when ads got sound. That got real old real fast, kind of like web pages with embedded MIDIs. I installed an ad blocker and haven’t looked back. Any time I browse Internet without a blocker it’s a horror show that kills me inside. If ads were reasonably sized static images I could manage it, but advertisers shot themselves in the foot by making their ads so obnoxious and went all-in on tracking. The trust is gone forever. Ads and advertisers can burn in hell.

            • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              The pop-up ads that spawned more pop-ups, and they were all animated and played sound. The only way out was holding down the power button until the computer dies.