When Mehdi Hasan sat down with Jon Stewart last month, the roles were reversed. This time, the Emmy-winning host of The Daily Show was the one asking the questions — about corporate media, Gaza, Do…
What a stupid question and attempt to discredit him. If Ukraine had a president who was favorable to Russia, they would of capitulated instantly. So yes, Zelensky is one of the reason the country still stands.
Why do people keep repeating this as if Jon Stewart is some vapid movie star? He’s essentially campaigned for the past 20 years or so and has shown himself to be politically capable and well informed. Also, Jon Stewart is the court jester, not simply a comedian.
And that’s a problem. He’s a really great guy and all, but his biases are obvious and he maintains the neoliberal status quo. He also acts as a pressure relief valve to air our frustrations and make us feel sane in a completely bonkers world, but that’s the opposite of fighting back.
We don’t need celebrity presidents, we need a fucking revolution.
It started with me not ever liking fucking Seth Meyers or Jimmy Fallon or the other Jimmy and I’ve extended this distaste to anybody talking and notdoing anything about Trump‘s abysmal fucking behavior. Jon Stewart can jump up his own ass, and so can the British guy
Trump has done exactly one thing right. He has united his entire party to accomplish their goals. They’re utter shit goals by utter shit people, but they’re accomplishing exactly what they set out to do.
Name one candidate who could do that better than Jon Stewart.
Bernie is too fucking old. He was too old for the presidency 12 years ago.
AOC is too fucking young, and the moderates hate her. She has less of a chance than Harris did. She also suffers the same issue Hillary did: the GOP has been running against her for a decade already. They’ve poisoned the well on her something fierce. She would make an excellent VP, but she doesn’t have the chops to win the presidency herself.
Mamdani is ineligible to run for president, and you must have seen how much opposition he faces even from his own party. Even if he could run, he doesn’t have a chance on the national stage.
Stewart comes prepackaged with 10,000 sound bites tearing apart the GOP on every issue they’ve ever raised.
Scott Kelly and Mark Kelly (twins, both were Navy Captains, both were Astronauts, one is now a Senator from Arizona) would be good, but they aren’t progressive enough.
Who else?
You put Jon Stewart in the White House, hire his writing staff into the west wing, and we’ll have Universal Healthcare in 6 months.
Scott Kelly and Mark Kelly (twins, both were Navy Captains, both were Astronauts, one is now a Senator from Arizona) would be good, but they aren’t progressive enough.
I like Jon but don’t believe celebrities should run for office. He’s also repeatedly said he has no interest in years past, so this is just a pipe dream for liberals.
I don’t think Clinton’s or Harris’ problems were their genitalia. I think it was that they both were fundamentally bland and uninspiring candidates running bland and uninspiring campaigns against a guy who got his base whipped into a frenzy every time he stepped on stage. They are both immeasurably better-qualified and more well-suited for the office, but Clinton ran on an “it’s business as usual, which means that it’s my turn” platform, and Harris ran on a “let’s get back to business as usual, I’m better than the other guy” platform; and by the time they course-corrected, they had both run out of time.
Harris even had a taste of that base-engaging fervor in the early days of Walz’s selection, when he was going on attack and calling Republicans “weird,” but then her consultants pulled the leash and he brought it back to business as usual.
Would AOC succeed where Clinton or Harris failed? I doubt it. She’s been the subject of a GOP smear campaign for six years now. But it won’t be just because she’s a woman. There’s still a lot of misogyny in the American electorate, of course, but I think it’d honestly account for something like 3-5%. Enough to make a difference in a close race, but not enough to truly sink a good, compelling candidate.
Pretty much agree with everything that you’ve said. The goal is to motivate the base and to galvanize a new wave of voters. You can’t achieve that if you don’t provide anything substantive.
Oh Jesus more celebrities in politics is the last thing you guys need
Zelensky was also a comedian. It’s woklrking out surprisingly okay for him given the situation.
Ukraine elects comedian as president Russia invades Ukraine
US elects comedian as president …
Who was president of Ukraine when russisa took crimea?
You think things have gone well for Zelenskyy??
I certainly think he’s shown amazing leadership ability.
Given the situation he was handed, he’s handled it well.
What a stupid question and attempt to discredit him. If Ukraine had a president who was favorable to Russia, they would of capitulated instantly. So yes, Zelensky is one of the reason the country still stands.
No thanks to America and it’s fascist pro Russia government
I mean he worked hard for veterans rights.
Why do people keep repeating this as if Jon Stewart is some vapid movie star? He’s essentially campaigned for the past 20 years or so and has shown himself to be politically capable and well informed. Also, Jon Stewart is the court jester, not simply a comedian.
John Stewart is probably the only one I could actually get behind.
And that’s a problem. He’s a really great guy and all, but his biases are obvious and he maintains the neoliberal status quo. He also acts as a pressure relief valve to air our frustrations and make us feel sane in a completely bonkers world, but that’s the opposite of fighting back.
We don’t need celebrity presidents, we need a fucking revolution.
John knows how to fight. Look at what he has done for veterans and 911 survivors
Didn’t he fight for the veterans?
It started with me not ever liking fucking Seth Meyers or Jimmy Fallon or the other Jimmy and I’ve extended this distaste to anybody talking and notdoing anything about Trump‘s abysmal fucking behavior. Jon Stewart can jump up his own ass, and so can the British guy
Hey. Shut up.
Trump has done exactly one thing right. He has united his entire party to accomplish their goals. They’re utter shit goals by utter shit people, but they’re accomplishing exactly what they set out to do.
Name one candidate who could do that better than Jon Stewart.
You Americans don’t see the insanity since you’re deep in it
Name one American politician you respect more than Jon Stewart.
not an american… but I feel you guys have 3: Bernie, AOC, Zohran Mamdani
Bernie is too fucking old. He was too old for the presidency 12 years ago.
AOC is too fucking young, and the moderates hate her. She has less of a chance than Harris did. She also suffers the same issue Hillary did: the GOP has been running against her for a decade already. They’ve poisoned the well on her something fierce. She would make an excellent VP, but she doesn’t have the chops to win the presidency herself.
Mamdani is ineligible to run for president, and you must have seen how much opposition he faces even from his own party. Even if he could run, he doesn’t have a chance on the national stage.
Stewart comes prepackaged with 10,000 sound bites tearing apart the GOP on every issue they’ve ever raised.
Scott Kelly and Mark Kelly (twins, both were Navy Captains, both were Astronauts, one is now a Senator from Arizona) would be good, but they aren’t progressive enough.
Who else?
You put Jon Stewart in the White House, hire his writing staff into the west wing, and we’ll have Universal Healthcare in 6 months.
I’m waiting for the insane part.
The most generic democrats you could support
Turn your criticism-gun toward Stewart. What have you got on him? Why shouldn’t he be president?
I like Jon but don’t believe celebrities should run for office. He’s also repeatedly said he has no interest in years past, so this is just a pipe dream for liberals.
AOC has a major problem she doesn’t have a penis.
I don’t think Clinton’s or Harris’ problems were their genitalia. I think it was that they both were fundamentally bland and uninspiring candidates running bland and uninspiring campaigns against a guy who got his base whipped into a frenzy every time he stepped on stage. They are both immeasurably better-qualified and more well-suited for the office, but Clinton ran on an “it’s business as usual, which means that it’s my turn” platform, and Harris ran on a “let’s get back to business as usual, I’m better than the other guy” platform; and by the time they course-corrected, they had both run out of time.
Harris even had a taste of that base-engaging fervor in the early days of Walz’s selection, when he was going on attack and calling Republicans “weird,” but then her consultants pulled the leash and he brought it back to business as usual.
Would AOC succeed where Clinton or Harris failed? I doubt it. She’s been the subject of a GOP smear campaign for six years now. But it won’t be just because she’s a woman. There’s still a lot of misogyny in the American electorate, of course, but I think it’d honestly account for something like 3-5%. Enough to make a difference in a close race, but not enough to truly sink a good, compelling candidate.
Pretty much agree with everything that you’ve said. The goal is to motivate the base and to galvanize a new wave of voters. You can’t achieve that if you don’t provide anything substantive.
I don’t respect ANY American, you’re all a disaster
So you’re an idiot
No im not an American. I know I’m not an idiot cause my country didn’t elect Donald trump
You sound like an American.
Wow you’re straight up stupid
Thank you for giving me so much attention. Makes me feel special.
You guys implies you’re trying to other us, go fuck yourself. I’m intolerant of intolerance go jam this opinion up your own ass.
No wonder America is a dumpster fire with your toxic hate