You must log in or register to comment.
I too pass gas freely when riding.
I think food to pedal the bike cost money.
And don’t even get me started on all the healthcare the meat bag driving it needs.
Edmonton is in Canada, so that is covered 👍
Just don’t get your teeth knocked out in the crash
Teeth? Do you mean Luxury Bones™?
Luxury Bones Enamel Edition Pro Max
Probably less than non-cyclists due to better health, so a net negative cost.
Studies have actually been done on this.
Cyclists do have higher risk of injury from traffic, but the health benefits from the exercise they get more than makes up for it. Cyclists have significantly lower all-around mortality and injury/sickness rates than car drivers.
US specific issue.
I guess when you have fancy pants, you go on adventures.
Also the extra exercise will prolong your life and you’ll have to pay even more.
Longer life means you have to buy more food. That will make a hilarious ad campaign for cars - save money, live shorter
Live fat, die young
Damn, I miss their compilations
You need food regardless if you bike or drive. Maybe just a little more if you are in good trim and bike a lot. Still cheaper than gas for a car though.
Its more the cocaine needed to ride long distance that costs the money.
That’s why I use an electric self driving bike
Yeah, ebikes are significantly more economical and ecological. The human body is very inefficient at converting calories into kinetic energy, and producing 1kcal of food has a much worse CO2 output than even burning 1kcal worth of coal. Even if you follow a vegan diet
The human body will burn calories pretty much either way, and if you let your body adjust to daily riding your resting energy use will go down. If you want to be healthy you need exercise either way. Given all that you can consider the energy required to ride a bicycle for a medium distance daily to be virtually free.
if you let your body adjust to daily riding your resting energy use will go down
No, that’s just a lie. The only way you’re gonna significantly reduce your BMR from daily bike riding is if you were a fatty and lost weight due to it, but a diet would accomplish the same job. If an untrained person starts commuting daily with their bike the exact opposite will happen, they will grow more muscles in their calves and quads, which will significantly increase the amount of calories they passively burn, and that’s on top of the energy you burn while riding the bicycle.
You don’t need to make up bullshit to justify commuting with a bicycle, it will absolutely increase the amount of calories you will need to eat, but that’s a low price to pay for the money you save not commuting with a car, let alone the health benefits
You are right, I was working with outdated info. Just last year there was a study that showed the body doesn’t compensate metabolically for the exercise and the added calorie burn is not offset by conservation elsewhere. I can’t find the source of my misconception, but I guess it was widespread enough that they ran a study to disprove it.
One of my friends did a personal study on his costs at uni and found it was more cost effective to drive his car (this was in the early 2000’s) than it was to ride his bike to uni everyday than buy the food required to fuel the 50km round trip.
Hope he wasn’t majoring in anything like math or biology.
Well he certainly wasn’t majoring in wilful ignorance so that probably works in his favour.
Wbat food did he use for that math? Because I doubt it would have hold up if he only used rice/beans/noodles/etc. To fuel his bike ride.
He tracked his food costs and fuel costs for a few months, noted when he drove and when he cycled and then correlated total costs with transportation mode. I have no idea how he was sourcing his food or what he was eating.
So drive and starve was the conclusion? Was this Trump U?
No it was the increase in petrol cost was less when he drove than his increase in food cost when he rode, he ate fine when he drove
25km each way is, best case scenario, 1h per trip, in that case if public transport is not an option, yeah, I’d take the car
I think public transport at the time was a real screw around for him because his area was poorly serviced and the nearest train station was super dodgy
Yeah I live in a city with decent public transportation, but unfortunately my neighborhood is the one that’s poorly serviced, it’d take me two hours and multiple changes to get to work, it takes me 35 minutes by car and 20 by motorbike.
Of course I take the latter as often as possible, it’s just better, even on fuel consumption.I’d like to bicycle to work like I did to my previous job, but here it’s just not an option, it’d take over one hour, I’d get there drenched in sweat, and risk my life multiple times.
Have you seen the cost of groceries?
Well, it’s about one banana per half an hour
Most people pay almost twice as much
Bout to stroll up with a peddle assist and demand free gas
arent there bikes that run on gas though?
We generally refer to those as Mopeds, at least in the US
Omg. So dumb. They are never going to sell any regular.
If you’re on mastodon and like dad jokes, puns and thai recipes, Natasha is a good follow
Cool, now do oil based tire prices.
How often do you change tyres?
You’re making perfection the enemy of good. Nobody said bikes themselves were free - everything requires some maintenance and parts.
And if we are comparing bike tires to car tires, they are still a lower volume of petroleum based rubber, and cheaper (especially given that you need two rather than four). A new bike tire is generally anywhere between $50-100, so that’s $100-200 to change the pair you are riding. And new car tires are about $150-250 depending on brand and size, so that’s $600-$1000.
A car runs on money and makes you fat.
A bike runs on fat and saves you money.
Good thing they are free! Wait…they aren’t? And they run on fossil fuel tires?? Oops.
Bicycles have less mass than a car and therefore need less fossil fuel for their tires. Bicycles are objectively cheaper to buy, maintain, and run than a car, even if you go for the average expensive bicycle and the average cheap car. There just is no way to make the car come out on top when it’s about costs.
The saving money part might be not completely true
It’s definitely possible to spend a lot on your bicycle but it is almost certainly cheaper than using and maintaining a car
Time is money tho
In cities bikes are often faster than cars. They don’t get stuck in traffic and you don’t have to worry about parking. On longer distances this goes away, but short urban trips are no brainers.
Depends on the city. And the definition of city.
My city used to be a “bicycle city” before it was cool, but nowadays cars have taken over the roads and the bike infrastructure that’s been created sucks, when I worked just 6km from home, car was faster even in rush hour traffic. Now work is outside the city and the bike is simply too impractical, it takes too much time and it’s dangerous.
I have fond memories of working and living in the country side and going to work on my MTB through tree plantations, but alas, that’s in the past.
Even the higher-price mid-range bikes are way cheaper than the cheapest cars, and there’s a lot on the bike that you can just do yourself instead of relying on a mechanic, most parts are cheaper as well, lots of bikes allow more personalization…
Bikes are the paragon of freedom Anericans think cars are.
