“Babe did you fix that hole in the drywall yet?”
“I’m sorry but I prefer not to continue this conversation. I’m still learning so I appreciate your understanding and patience.”
Gemini: Ah you ran into the classic partner issue…
Thinking out loud for a second…
I find Claude to actually pushes back more than ChatGPT does. That’s why I prefer to use Claude. But of course, I still do due diligence.
Yea, I got a snarky reply earlier about actually reading the directions it gave me. I can respect some pushback.
“why didn’t you do them?”
“That is a good question and it merits further explanation. When you made your originally inquiry I determined that the answer you wanted to hear was “yes.” so that is the answer that I provided. Upon further reflection it is clear that your question required a more thoughtful answer. If you would like me to provide more truthful answers in the future, please amend your queries with “no cap” and I will do my best to remember that preference.”
It’s like that Asimov story with the mind-reading robot that would tell everyone what they wanted to hear because to do otherwise would hurt their feelings and violate the First Law.
It’s a short story so here’s a full story :)
These are a lot more intelligent than I thought.
You’re not usernaming hard enough I fear.
“Why didn’t you do them?”
“This is a known issue…”
You’re absolutely right! I shouldn’t have put the dirty dishes into the bin instead of cleaning them. This was a clear violation of my instructions, and I’ll be sure not to make this mistake again!
adds
TODO: cleansticker to pile of dishesclosed, wontfix
Oh, so it’s like having a teenager in the house.
Fuck Claude
Dumb question, but…is Claude worse than GPT or Gemini?
I was under the impression that it was the lesser of evils
I just started with Claude and I can’t yet distinguish when it has actually done something it says it has done. With ChatGPT I can see through the bullshit quite well by now. At first I was happy when I thought Claude was rid of that bullshit, but turns out it’s just a different type of bullshit.
The UI and file handling is better in Claude though, and supposedly you can make it create skills which are like instruction booklets on how to do some tasks and then export and share them. But the ones I created were lost during the weekend so I’m not sure how robust they actually are.
Claude is almost always the better model compared to GPT. I find that this is a good leaderboard. However, both Claude and GPT have similar business models: make sure everything they do is completely proprietary, and keep everything behind a monthly paywall. They both run massive data centers to train their models, and neither really deserves the term “Artificial Intelligence”.
They are the lesser of the available evils. Anthropic, the proprietors of Claude, were blacklisted by the US administration for refusing to greenlight their technology being used for fascism.
Anthropic’s AI system was used to target the school in Minab, killing 120 students. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/03/11/us-strike-iran-elementary-school-ai-target-list/
The company is suing to be able to supply the US military again.
Maven is doing the targeting, not Claude.
Also the WaPo is now Bezos’ news.
And Maven used Anthropic’s AI https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Maven
Yes, but not for targeting, as explained in the article I linked.
The Maven Smart System is the platform that came out of those exercises, and it, not Claude, is what is being used to produce “target packages” in Iran.
That’s one way to spin it.
My take on it is that it was used inappropriately, and when the fascists wanted it tailored for that abhorrent use, Anthropic refused, and in retaliation the fascists banned it for ANY use, so now Anthropic is suing to allow the sane to continue using it for it’s appropriate uses.
What sane use? And how does this company plan to prevent the fascists from using it to kill another 120 children?
The only not-evil move is to not sell dual-use goods to fascists in the first place.
You seriously can’t think of any sane use? How about categorizing large amounts of data. Brainstorming strategies for problem solving. Converting pseudo code to actual code. Troubleshooting error messages. I mean, there are dozens upon dozens of valid uses that harm no one.
How does Bic plan to prevent murderers from stabbing people with their pens? How does Toyota plan to stop drivers from committing vehicular manslaughter? How does Hewlett-Packard plan on preventing fascists from saving manifestos? How does Apple plan on preventing sexual criminals from taking pictures of their victims?
What’s that? Companies don’t need to accomplish impossible tasks to have a viable product? I guess it’s only AI that has insurmountable demands placed on them by reactionaries.
The only not-evil move is to sit in a cave using sticks, once the trees figure out how to keep cavemen from beating their children with them.
I wasn’t clear. What I meant was: what sane things could a fascist military use AI for?
“Reactionary” lmao. My friend, I use LLMs all the time. Just not the proprietary ones from companies that are in bed with fascists.
There are many less evils. Use open source/weight AI like Kimi, GLM, Deepseek, Mistral, Olmo, Arcee, Minimax, Qwen, Exaone, NVidia, Sarvam…
If you don’t have the hardware to run locally, you can pay for API. If you find the company problematic for whatever reason, you can switch to the same model served by a third party (possible because the model weights are publicly released).
Other than wanting a verbose answer to a question, what is it for?
For me I just use it to get verbose answers to questions.
I use open-weight LLM over search engines when I can, because Google/Bing/Yandex are complete proprietary black boxes run by corporations of questionable morality.
Or you could just not use LLMs. Fuck AI.
In what manner? Capabilities, or belonging to an evil corporation that happily steals data and works to undermine democracy?
deleted by creator
It is better than GPT and Gemini but not great. Claude some US military contracts. At least to public knowledge.
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/04/pentagon-blacklist-anthropic-defense-tech-claude.html
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declared on X that any contractor or supplier doing business with the U.S. military is barred from commercial activity with Anthropic.
The announcement came after Anthropic executives refused to comply with the government’s demands over its model use. They wanted assurances that their AI would not be tapped for fully autonomous weapons or mass domestic surveillance of America.
Anthropic’s models are still being used to support the U.S. military operations in Iran, even after the announcement from the Trump administration, as CNBC previously reported.
less of the evils. That being said as far as quality goes Claude has taken a very noticeable decline in quality within the past several months. used to be half decent but now 8 to 9 times out of 10 you’re going to get an hallucination for a solution. Anthropic has REALLY dropped the ball with Claude and Claude code. absolute garbage LLM now.
This could be user error, to some degree.
No. Many people here just hate LLMs in general and will use every opportunity to complain about it.
Personally I dislike how helpless and useless it makes my fellow colleagues at research.
No thought given, use the first web result (and in most cases, just accept the AI output as search gospel).In my case it’s only used for very obscure issue descriptions my google-fu isnt sufficient enough for or correlating weird bugs with each other.
That’s the same reason I hate bicycles! They make travel too easy for everyone. Need to go somewhere? All my associates immediately reach for their bikes, and think of it as the default mode of travel. Heaven forbid they put actual effort into traveling by walking the whole way, or better yet, crawling so that they can include their arms in the endeavor like nature intended.
I only use a bicycle when I’m going to a very obscure location and would have to do my crawling on dirt trails otherwise.
Except you should be comparing it to motorized wheelchairs. Suddenly all your associates forget how to walk, WALL-E style.
The events of Wall-E happened over generations. If your associates have forgotten how to walk already then they never knew how to begin with and were just faking it until something came along to save them. So at least now with a wheelchair as a crutch they can actually contribute rather than just pretending to be productive but getting nothing done in reality.
I’d say 99.9% of people. You’re actually the first other person I’ve seen who doesn’t!
Yeesh, get out more.
I hate ai and junior devs pushing ai dente spaghetti code into my project
Then build better guardrails. These are the tools of the future. (And I intend both meanings of the word “tools”.) AI is very good at following rules. In their absence, they require someone far more experienced to drive them properly.
This is a really good point! It used to be “a computer is only as smart as its user.” The same can be said of AI: the model’s results are kind of dictated by the prompt. while anyone can prompt an AI with whatever they want, it takes experience to use an AI to develop a project from idea to v1. At the e d of the day, the AI can search the web better than me, and type faster than I can - but I know what I want my code to do, and I know how I want it done. Those two things don’t have to be mutually exclusive.
The stuck-on residue is real.
But here’s the brutal reality: it’s not just residue; it’s residon’t.
Options:
- A: (recommended) do the dishes
- B: don’t do the dishes
- C: mix of both
C, ah, the ADHD special
This used to be called being a suck up.
How to gaslight: a primer
Genuinely made me laugh.
