Planchette @lemmy.zip to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 9 days agoSeriously, I'm ancom, not authcomlemmy.zipexternal-linkmessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up157arrow-down10
arrow-up157arrow-down1external-linkSeriously, I'm ancom, not authcomlemmy.zipPlanchette @lemmy.zip to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square28linkfedilink
minus-squareFurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·8 days agoI am one but I’m so frustrated I have to explain the difference between anarchy and chaos every time I mention what I think…
minus-squarealapakala@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·8 days agoI don’t: “No rulers don’t mean no norms.”
minus-squareFurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-28 days agoI actually say that anarchy is about more rules and better application when that subject comes up
minus-squareTotallyWorthLife (She/Her)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-27 days agofor a long time I thought it was “no rules”, not “no rulers”, so I can see where my initial misinterpretation came from. I already understand it a bit better, but I should learn more anyways.
minus-squareinfinitesunrise@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 days agoQuite the opposite, in fact.
minus-squarecaptainlezbian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agoFunny enough I think V for Vandetta did a pretty good job of explaining it in an accessible way.
Ⓐ
I am one but I’m so frustrated I have to explain the difference between anarchy and chaos every time I mention what I think…
I don’t: “No rulers don’t mean no norms.”
I actually say that anarchy is about more rules and better application when that subject comes up
for a long time I thought it was “no rules”, not “no rulers”, so I can see where my initial misinterpretation came from.
I already understand it a bit better, but I should learn more anyways.
sure, here
Thank you!
Quite the opposite, in fact.
Funny enough I think V for Vandetta did a pretty good job of explaining it in an accessible way.