antonim@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 days agorulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up1416arrow-down19
arrow-up1407arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.worldantonim@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square37linkfedilink
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 days agoThe problem is they have to over-hype it because they aren’t making their money back. Even frontier models are not yet strong AI aka they seriously need human supervision to check what’s coming out. What do you consider “strong AI”?
minus-squareZephyr@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoStrong AI has the same capabilities as a human mind at minimum.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 days agoThat’s actual AI (what people are now calling AGI), and LLMs aren’t capable of that. They’d have to develop a new technology.
minus-squareZephyr@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoI’m not saying this current push strictly is. That said it’s far more capable than one would have assumed for an algorithm just doing next word prediction. There’s something in there that can be distilled.
The problem is they have to over-hype it because they aren’t making their money back.
What do you consider “strong AI”?
Strong AI has the same capabilities as a human mind at minimum.
That’s actual AI (what people are now calling AGI), and LLMs aren’t capable of that. They’d have to develop a new technology.
I’m not saying this current push strictly is. That said it’s far more capable than one would have assumed for an algorithm just doing next word prediction. There’s something in there that can be distilled.