Gormadt@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 18 小时前Gorillaz Based of Course [Rule]slrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square47linkfedilinkarrow-up1739arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1733arrow-down1external-linkGorillaz Based of Course [Rule]slrpnk.netGormadt@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 18 小时前message-square47linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarevzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·14 小时前You can. He says that it’s not relevant. Now you tell him why he’s wrong. You don’t whine because he’s disrespectful.
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down10·13 小时前 Now you tell him why he’s wrong. he’s wrong because he’s edgy, and the discussion on his points have been done for centuries by better people than me.
minus-squarevzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·13 小时前You know, you can just say “I refuse to engage with your obvious rage bait”. But he’s not wrong because he’s edgy. He’s wrong because he’s wrong. Or not. As the case might be.
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down7·13 小时前but I don’t want to not engage with obvious rage bait. I want to humiliate rage baiters
minus-squareAzuranAurora@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·13 小时前You’re only humiliating yourself.
![Gorillaz Based of Course [Rule]](https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/5a959005-1f02-40b2-b5f2-f55691ef753c.png){kind=link}
You can. He says that it’s not relevant. Now you tell him why he’s wrong. You don’t whine because he’s disrespectful.
he’s wrong because he’s edgy, and the discussion on his points have been done for centuries by better people than me.
You know, you can just say “I refuse to engage with your obvious rage bait”.
But he’s not wrong because he’s edgy. He’s wrong because he’s wrong. Or not. As the case might be.
but I don’t want to not engage with obvious rage bait.
I want to humiliate rage baiters
You’re only humiliating yourself.