• SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    What Youtube seems not to understand is…they serve at the people’s pleasure. And even more so…they exist BECAUSE people create their product (content).

    They’re not too big to fail; they’re just not annoying enough for mass exodus, yet. Classic frog in boiling pot.

    Let’s all remember - Youtube is a replaceable commodity. I would make efforts to download / store what videos you find irreplaceable from there (0.5-1T of hard-drive should store roughly 1500-2000, 20-30 minute youtube vids, at 720p@60), streaming them locally and intermingling with other sources.

    In fact, I am working on an effort to do just that, by creating a local, SMB backed “channel” in my forked version of SmartTube

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    youtube/google is spending more time, money and reputation (not that it cares about reputation since its the only player in the game) trying to defeat adblockers, than it would have ever spent on just moderating its platform to make sure its not airing scams, malicious misinformation, frauds, hoaxes, outright porn, and all the other nasty shit that piss people off about the advertising.

    cause thats really all this comes down to. no one likes ads, but they’d be a lot more tolerable if google fucking policed what they showed so people didnt get fucking AI nudifying ads on kids videos, or if they just didnt air 2 hour long prageru videos about why the white race is superior and why blacks should be happy whites “elevated” them with slavery.

    but they’d rather force us to see that shit, than put in the slightest effort of moderating themselves

  • Stolas@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I scrolled down the comments curious about what other third party apps there were and I was really surprised.

    The only app I was aware of was Revanced, and I’m not sure if the other apps are new and popping up because YouTube keeps giving more attention to them or if I was just unaware.

  • ProfessorYakkington@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah , I love a good ad blocker / sponsor block / privacy frontend but they all feel like duck tape on a sinking boat. At some point we have to move away from these centralized platforms but the enshitification hasn’t outweighed the lion’s share of content / creators on these platforms to a tipping point for the majority. Ad blocks let you mitigate the enshitification so you can stay on these platforms longer - in many cases this is required so not knocking it, I do it as well. My hope is that as these companies continue to go after ad blocks users will finally jump ship in mass as they are forced to confront the lovecraftian nightmare that is any of these platforms without an ad block.

    • Mustachius_Grumpius@thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      so thats I why I welcome that new chinese entry - bilibili. I think it will give yoube good competition.
      I would just repost shit there from youtube

      • ProfessorYakkington@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I certainly agree that more options will help - but, I would love to see a more federate / user powered, owned option take YouTube’s place not just Youtube #2. it feels like a centralized option will just corrupt over time no matter the intentions and we will just be repeating the same mistakes but perhaps the economics of Video hosting / streaming at scale require something like this … I am not sure how the economics of something like peer tube scale but I would love to see us all learn from our mistake and not just make it again. But … maybe I am just idealistic and not grounded in reality.

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    pipepipe is working just fine for me. youtube will never win this war. the best they can do is force people to work around their temporary tricks, people who will always be more motivated than youtube engineers.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The content creators won’t make the effort unless they have some way to monetize their views though.

      • 8baanknexer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m my opinion the best days of YouTube were before monetization was a thing. There were plenty of creators back then, and it was a lot less corporate than it is now.

        • ∃∀λ@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          2 days ago

          People think TikTok took off because the algorithm has some magic sauce the other platforms don’t. Nope. It’s because the content was more authentic because creators couldn’t monetize. It was like YouTube in the early days.

        • antiR@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Unfortunately, you need monetization to keep going. If creators didn’t, they wouldn’t have folded to YouTube monetization rules and just kept posting whatever they wanted. Basically, YouTube demonitezes then crrators have folded to just censoring their videos instead of pushing back because of money.

          • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Your first phrase explains the problem perfectly IMO.

            Maybe everyone mustn’t make a youtube every other day. Sometimes I stumble onto an old youtube with all the information I need, but it’s getting rarer and rarer because people who “need” monetization push them out it seems.

          • Sexybill@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            2 days ago

            What they are saying tho is that people who want to make actual content don’t care about monetization. They do it for the love of the game. Sure you can get a few to censor swear words and suicide, but the thing that built it was freedom. If you take away freedom then you’ve got nothing. Half the equation is people who watch the content. If people don’t want to watch your shitty watered down bullshit, and other people don’t want to be gagged by censorship, you’re going to alienate the base; that is, actually red blooded humanity. Oh, let’s say between the creators and the viewers its about 60% of your base. It won’t be over night but it will be enough that ther3 will be alternatives to the bullshit. I say bull shit because that’s what it is. Fucking goddamn horseshit. Thank you for glistening.

            • antiR@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              AFAIK, it’s still possible to upload content that can be demonitized if you really don’t care about monetization. The video will not be deleted, it will just be demonitized. However, creators don’t want to get demonitized so they bow down. There is still freedom just as long it’s not some extreme stuff.

              • Sexybill@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                That’s true. We’ll need third party agregators of YouTube then yp see what pertains to our worldview. Whether or not this fractionalizes further the community is probably well documented.

    • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      From what I understand (very limited knowledge here, might be BS) YouTube actually pays creators more than pretty much any other platform.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s a privacy overlay like nitter for twitter, not a hosting platform.

        Works better than invideous though.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s a privacy overlay like nitter for twitter, not a hosting platform.

      • im_fine_sandy@nord.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I haven’t been able to get invidious to work reliably for a year or more.

        I’m not asking for a how-to. I’m happy enough with freetube on the desktop.

    • antiR@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe add Bilibili, TikTok, Facebook, and Dailymotion to the list. Yes, they also have ads but they are not that strict about ad blockers.

  • AmyAye@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 days ago

    God I wouldn’t mind if the ads weren’t so fucking cancer. Like I have streaming with ads and dumb Liberty Bibberty or whatever is fine.

    But YouTube, it constantly runs gambling scams and then rolls into a 90 minute “ad” podcast about some bull shit

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I will never pay for youtube while sponsor block is not part of the default app and downvoted are visible.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        YouTube can’t have sponser block as that is not part of YouTube.

      • AmyAye@nord.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Frankly, I find most YouTube content to be super obnoxious, so I would not pay for it anyway. I already barely ever use YouTube outside of trailers and music videos.

      • pheelicks@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Exactly. In some way this would even be appreciated since I would probably do way more useful and healthy things with the time that I currently spend on YT.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    The link is broken.
    After some searching, found it here.

    So no one else has to do that annoying seach, here is the article text.
    I’m sure formatting will be shite. Sorry about that.

    YouTube is becoming unwatchable for ad block users – thanks to this powerful new crackdown tactic News By Mark Wilson Published May 28, 2024 Videos now auto-skip to the end, ad block users report

    A laptop showing YouTube's ad blockers message next to a laptop showing UBlock Origin (Image credit: YouTube / Shutterstock / monticello) Share

    The battle between YouTube and ad blockers is heating up again, with some YouTube users reporting that videos are now auto-skipping to the end if they’re using extensions to block advertisements.

    The new YouTube tactic has been widely reported on Reddit (via 9to5Google), with ad blocker users revealing that video playback immediately skips to the end of their video. This apparently continues to happen even if the video is immediately replayed.

    While Google hasn’t officially stated that this is a new tactic for dealing with ad blockers, it has escalated its crackdown on apps and extensions that remove advertisements in its videos over the past few months.

    For example, in April a Google post in a YouTube Community forum stated that viewers who use third-party apps like NewPipe “may experience buffering issues or see the error “The following content is not available on this app” when trying to watch a video”.

    This new auto-skipping behavior appears to affect multiple ad-blocking extensions including AdBlock, although there’s some evidence that uBlock Origin has already found a workaround for the issue.

    The other solution, of course, is to subscribe to YouTube Premium ($13.99 / £12.99 / AU$32.99 a month), which is undoubtedly what YouTube is pushing users towards with its ad block crackdown. But its tactics are seemingly nudging many towards doubling down on ad blockers, resulting in a game of whack-a-mole that’s likely to run for a long time.

    Is Premium worth it? A YouTube Premium menu on a tablet

    (Image credit: Shutterstock) YouTube argues that using ad blockers “prevents the creator from being rewarded for viewership” and that the site’s increasingly long advertisements “help support creators and let billions of people around the world use the streaming service”.

    The problem is that, with those advertisements becoming increasingly lengthy and unskippable, many users feel that YouTube is increasingly looking to boost its own bottom line as much as its creators’ income.

    In a parallel to Netflix’s password-sharing crackdown, there is evidence that YouTube’s ad blocker is working – back in November, ZDNet reported that Google’s tactics had led to a record number of users uninstalling their ad blockers. And in February, YouTube reported that it had hit a new milestone of 100 million YouTube Music and Premium subscribers.

    But with YouTube Premium also recently getting its biggest price hike in years, many are still holding out and using ad blockers and extensions like YouTube Enhancer to preserve an ad-free experience. With YouTube ramping up its battle with ad blockers, though, the game of cat-and-mouse will likely become increasingly hard-fought.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Published May 28, 2024

      yt hasn’t defeated uBo or revanced/morphe in the 2 years since this article came out.

      • DaPorkchop_ [they/she/it]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        ngl, revanced doesn’t work for me anymore as of yesterday - most videos either drop to 144p after a few seconds and can’t be changed, or simply won’t load past the 1 minute mark. in the past i’ve been able to fix this by updating to a more recent revanced version, but i’m still having this on the latest youtube apk and revanced patches. will give it a few days and see if we get any new updates…

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Pichai, you fucking banchode.

    Oh, yes, uBlock Lite and a bunch of other plugins killing off intrusive ads can’t still be beat.

  • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just quit YouTube. Just part of degoogling. When I finally get all my auth off of Google I’ll finish it and go to graphene.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Any selfhosted, web based, alternative YT client? I’ve tried some quickly but nothing worked out of the box. Any recommendations?