E: this baby dicked Honda owner is laughing at the responses.

  • Okokimup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Am I the only one who took “baby-dicked” to be referencing experience rather than size?

  • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I read this comment as saying:

    1. Virginity isn’t special, so there’s no need to “save” it for someone special.
    2. The first person you have sex with doesn’t need to be anyone special. Holding out for some kind of perfect dude is impractical, because if you’re messing around with people your age, news flash, most young men are losers on the broader social scale. Being cool for a high schooler doesn’t mean much.
    3. Go ahead and fuck the dude with a cheap car and small dick. That’s not going to hold you back in the future, and chances are, your standards for partners will change over time.
    4. You can be anything. Overthrow the government.

    It seems that this comment section focuses a bit too much on the less important parts of the message, and don’t appreciate the context.

    • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      Part 4 is the most important.

      Kind of like a “fuck around find out”, except it’s more of a , “fuck around and systemically dismantle your oppressors” kinda thing

    • gray@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      My only problem with this post is the implied body-shaming. Otherwise 10/10

      • nickiwest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I read it as referring to immaturity rather than literal body shaming. Like, the post is telling a girl it’s okay to hook up with a teenage boy from her high school who just got his first car. She doesn’t have to “save herself” for marriage or even some idealized perfect man later in life.

        I grew up in the Assemblies of God, so I was on the receiving end of a lot of purity culture messaging. There was more than a reasonable amount of discussion of how “God has chosen your perfect husband and you have to wait for him.”

        I’m definitely not on board with the body shaming if that’s how it was intended. I just see that there’s more than one way to interpret that particular phrase. I choose to go with the more figurative version, which apparently puts me in the minority.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The concept of virginity, particularly the idea that a woman’s sexual history somehow determines her worth, was heavily shaped by patriarchal societies that used women’s sexuality as a means of controlling inheritance, marriage, and political power.

    The idea that an individual somehow becomes less of a person simply because she has had sex is absurd. A woman’s value does not diminish because someone has given her a label or because she has engaged in a perfectly ordinary human act.

    And then there is the glaring double standard. The man who had sex with her is often treated as some kind of hero, while she is supposedly diminished by the exact same act. He gets the bragging rights and the high fives; she gets judged for it.

    So apparently a man’s virginity is irrelevant, but a woman’s is supposed to be sacred. Not the person, mind you. The vagina.

    What a load of crap.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Though look at the bright side: with that attitude still kinda prevalent, people who hold it are more likely to show their cards early. Holding importance in someone else’s virginity can be written off as toxic insecurity.

  • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    ITT
    “Hey! No fair! I was a baby-dicked boy in a Honda Civic!”

    Yes, that was the point. To dress down hypermasculinity to reveal the real person you will be fucking, and then say “look honey, this dick can’t harm you existentially like all the messaging you ever received, threatened it would. It’s mostly harmless on its own. Go have fun.”

    If you don’t like that the hypothetical image of the boy had to be declawed before the girl felt safe, help fix it.

  • Leviathan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Is this implying that a horse cocked boy whose daddy bought him a fancy car could be taking something? Or are we just shaming a body type and class for comedic effect?

  • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Eh. Good message wrapped up in weird body shaming, class shaming, vaguely misandrist ‘rhetoric’.

    This aint it. It’s close to it. They’re the same aisle. But it aint it.

    • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah, it’s the type of post I’d privately nod+caveat if a friend made it, but not the type of post I’m sharing everywhere.

      The wrong kind of person is going to love that OOP is body-shaming and poverty-shaming because they feel putting people down is fun and/or uplifts them.

      • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        There are many that are that ‘wrong kind of person’ that simply don’t realize it. And to that person, that gets excited when they see men put down, I ask you to reflect on that feeling.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’m also not convinced that teaching your kids that sex is a non event is a good idea either.

      Also I’m confused about what’s wrong with the Honda civic, if you got one with all the optional extras it would be quite expensive, not that matters, but it’s just a weird vehicle to have chosen to indicate lack of money. Should have gone with something like a Nissan Micra, it would have still been the stupid take, but at least it would have made sense.

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Civics catch a lot of strays due to the sheer number of them and how long those things last. The drive train can literally outlast the body work. So there are a whole lot of used Civics on the road being driven by “poor” people who can’t afford better.

        • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          A rusted-out civic is often driven by two type of people - poor people who can’t afford better, or multi-millionaires that won’t spend money on anything more than that.

        • P1k1e@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Well poor is a pretty loose term these days so I’m unsure if it’d apply to me but my girl Gracy (2012 EX) has taken me across the country 3 times, been a makeshift tent after saving me from mountain lions and made me basically invisible to cops for her whole 360k miles, costing me nothing but oil, spark plugs, brake pads and a window regulator…and gas… When she dies I will drop a whole ass new engine in her with my own bare fukkin hands. They sure knew how to make em

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I see it kinda the same way as anything else, say, riding a bicycle: something normal, that is likely going to be part of your life and that you’ll enjoy doing, but don’t really need to if you don’t want.

        Sure you’ll remember your first bike fondly (or not) but you can have others and your most memorable memories are most likely from the trips you’ll take later.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    197
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is far too radical.

    The Honda Civic is a reliable car with a solid price point.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 minutes ago

      The Honda Civic is a reliable car with a solid price point.

      Yeah, that’s why carbrains hate it. A “real man” drives a huge truck rolling coal.

    • I love my Honda Civic!

      That was 6 years ago now. How time flies. <3

      Here’s the best feature a car can ever have.

      Kitties on the dashboard screen!!

      Here’s a more recent picture. One of the wheels had a valve stem hole that wasn’t in line with a lugnut hole, meaning the wheel covers wouldn’t fit. I bought an OEM wheel to replace it and put the wheel covers on, and it looks way better now.

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I had an EG hatch back in the day, now a WRX. The Civic was more fun. The Subaru makes me feel grown up. Gotta do all these adult things like change the gearbox fluid when you’re actually supposed to, else the gearbox explodes like a dropped beer.

        • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          It’s a 2012. It’s the first year of the 9th gen so yours would have been between 06-11. Not a lot of exterior differences between 2011 and 2012, but the instrument cluster did get a pretty radical overhaul.

          • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Sometimes they’ll keep making the older gen of a popular model concurrently with the first run of the newer gen, so you’ll end up with a manufacture date in the new gen’s model year. I don’t know if this has happened with Civics specifically, but it seems likely given how common they are.

          • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Mine was a 2012 as well, actually :) Didnt look like that tho :) probably different markets rather than either of us being wrong :)

            • boonhet@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Also model year and first registration date can and do differ and which one is used to say what year a car is, largely depends on where you’re from.

    • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I traded up my civic for a bolt. It felt civic-minded. Cuz man i got the lemon.

      Loved that civic, but zero regrets. This ev is way better.

  • Ricky Rigatoni@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Women: Lmao men with small penises are subhuman xddd

    Also women: Why are men so insecure about their penis size

      • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Based on my personal experience with misandry, yeah.

        Not all women asking why are men e.g. insecure about penis size, are shaming men for their penis size. As most women aren’t misandrists.

        But all women shaming men for e.g. penis size, turn around and ask why, and are really upset about misogyny, while happily engaging in misandry.

        Some men do it too. Obviously.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I’m actually really glad to see that people can mention misandry now without being immediately and uncritically downvoted into oblivion.

          It seems we’re progressing, because true egalitarianism won’t be possible until we can address both misandry and misogyny without acting like one is okay while the other is not.

        • Sundray@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’ll have to defer to your experience, since I have never had a conversation of any significance with a woman openly shaming men for their penis size. We spin in different circles, I suspect.

          • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Well, I said “e.g.” for a reason. Body shaming in general, but also stuff like pressuring/shaming men for rejecting sex.

            I am not surprised by your response as that is what I hear a lot before I start to point at recent specific examples that people are familiar with.

            But that conversation would be missing the point. The point is that people actively engaging in sexism are often very upset when the sexism turns against themselves and like to act as if their sexism is not the cause of e.g. insecurities. It is literally the most basic thing abusers (of the type) do.

            Again obviously, most people who express concern, aren’t the abuser. But abusers like to act like they care before continuing abuse.

          • Bluewing@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            “Small penis” jokes are even fairly common even in places around Lemmy if you pay attention.

            A common place to see them is in a instance such as @fuckcars. If a member says they saw a large pickup truck driving down the road today, at some point in the thread there will be comments about how the driver “must be compensating for something.” No one actually cares about the size beyond the phycological insult directed at the man.

            Guys hear this insult a lot over their lives directed at men in general.

            • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              I’ve dwelt among the humans. Their entire culture is built around their penises. It’s funny to say they are small, it’s funny to say they are big. I’ve been at parties, where humans have held bottles, pencils, thermoses in front of themselves and called out “hey look at me! I’m Mr. so and so dick.” “I’ve got such and such for a penis.” I never saw it fail to get a laugh.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s just oozing through the cracks. You fooled them for a bit, but it always comes out, doesn’t it.

  • Murse@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Actual sex ed is, as usual, the answer to these kinds of situations. I’d guess way more critically so for the Civic boy than Pony’s daughter, since Pony seems open to actually discussing some shit with her daughter, especially if Civic boy actually gives a fuck about virginity.

    …oh, and guillotine construction. Definitely don’t forget the guillotine construction.

  • threeonefour@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    “I refuse to teach my daughter about virginity. I will instead teach her to judge a man by his car and penis size.”

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That is essentially how I read this too, yes.

      Just your typical, run-of-the-mill pseudo-feminist on the internet thinking she’s making a point while actually supporting the patriarchy by reinforcing its standards and expectations.

      And also teaching her daughter to be careless about who she shares her body with, because “it isn’t special.” … Yeah, toxic men are going to love her for this…

      • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Hate to break the news to you. But you opened up a thread for discussion, and inside it, you found discussion. You did actually ask for it.

      • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Every heterosexual man who is comfortable with their masculinity and sexuality will, at some point in their life, want a dildo shoved up their ass - because that’s where the g-spot is.

  • morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I feel like this point could be made without insulting her daughter’s future partner

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Oh, totally. I’m not defending the joke. It’s mid. I’m just saying that removing the exaggerated extra commentary just makes it a statement.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If the “joke” was about “flat-chested women who can’t cook” not being “special,” then suddenly you might be more reluctant to defend it as “humor”…

        • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          According to the mom, if he pulled up in a Ferrari with a pringle can, her virginity as a concept would be relevant again.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          22 hours ago

          That is what our patriarchy teaches us, is it not? That we must be providers and fertile to have value. It’s our role as men, no?

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Are you saying it’s a valid argument because it’s in agreement with the patriarchy? Saying “the patriarchy teaches this” isn’t exactly a very good argument for “so we should accept it as valid and true”…

            • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I really thought… I really thought I loaded that statement with so much ridiculous bullshit that you guys would all understand that I was being satirical. And poes law got me again.

              • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Satire doesn’t always convey over plaintext, as it lacks tone of voice, facial expression, and gesture. That’s why we have emojis and “/s” tags…