This is a joke about face sitting.
Season 7 episode 21, Assie Come Home
What about the one where Fry sleeps with his own grandmother to become his own grandfather?
lmfao
I should have gone with that one
Isn’t this the same country that has a pedo prince, and ties to the biggest pedo ring in modern history? Something about a Seville too…
It’s also going to make that porn more popular. Media bans don’t actually work because of how media demand works. Supply and demand don’t naturally coordinate for media exchange, except by apply risk to non-paying recipients of media. That’s how copyright works. If you apply risk to non-paying recipients for a different reason, economics doesn’t care about your reason. Just that you applied risk. Risk applied to paying parties goes into a different part of the formula. The result is total demand goes up (cash changing hand motivating production), but it becomes sold as a contraban.
D = CV*min(1,FR/FV)-CR, F(free) V(value) R(risk) C(commercial)
Because these are all distributions. Subtracting the CR distribution from that more complex part never gives you a zero distribution. But if FR is uniformly zero, demand goes to zero. Once you introduce FR you open the window of coordination (modifier of CV) to be non-zero. Because copyright enforcement is lax for pornography, FR is basically zero now. But it’s about to not be.
It’s the same reason commercial production of CSAM increases.
Ok, bye.
There is some explanation missing before this makes sense. In which units is demand measured? In currency? In amounts of “media”? What is free risk supposed to mean? And what is commercial risk? And how can it be the same unit as free and commercial value, and demand? 1€ risk? How do you apply it? How can they be distributions? Are we talking about probability distributions? What if CV < CR argh… Where can I find answers?
With this new law effect in the UK, does that mean that most of Totally Spies is banned there?
Not from the UK, what’s this about. Can’t sit on faces no more?
Any dorm of choking is banned, which includes face sittning apparently.
A new law that bans several kinks in porn is taking effect today.
Governmental kink shaming? Yikes.
Very British
I sometimes feel like the British authorities would ban sex altogether if they could find people some other way that would be willing to eat kidney pie.
When it comes to British culture, the thing I’m most hung up on is their definition of “pudding“. As an American, this is what “pudding“ means to me:
But when the British use the word “pudding“ I have absolutely no goddamn idea what they mean. I have been trying to figure it out for decades, immersing myself in British culture, and I am no closer to figuring it out than I was when I started.
Is it a car? A breed of cow? A 15th century poet? A sweet sausage meat pie made with a crispy crust? A Welsh slur for immigrants? A sex act that was popular during the Victorian era? I have no fucking idea…
As another 'Murican, the way I understand it is that if it’s boiled or steamed inside of an animal intestine or stomach, that’s a pudding. And even if it’s fried later, it’s still a pudding. See: Black Pudding, a British blood pudding.
And if it’s only steamed, often wrapped in a cloth, it’s probably a desert.
In any case, if some British person offers you a “pudding” don’t ask questions you really don’t want the answer to. Just shut up and eat it. They ARE British after all. And if you really don’t want to risk it, ask if you can go to a curry shop instead. Blessed be the Indians who taught the Brits to cook at least one edible dish.
This doesn’t really answer any questions, but at least I’ll end up at a nice curry shop.
Always room for a little pud
It means desert.
It means desert.
Thanks for clearing that up
That’s a chocolate mousse.
A chocolate mousse is whipped and much lighter and fluffier. It’s consistency is closer to that of a paste. Chocolate pudding is saucier and more gooey in texture. A mousse would be able to hold its form. A pudding certainly would not.
But they are very similar in both flavor and appearance
I think their pudding was introduced in food rationing during some war or another. To let the meat and such go farther, they made pudding from things like leftover bread and whatever.
The word pudding was around long before there was a Britain. It was much simpler back then. A pudding was anything you stuffed into an animal intestine or stomach and boiled the Hell out of it, (See: Holy Water).
At some point, when ingredients like eggs, sugar, and flour became common, the Brits kind of went off the rails and completely lost the whole thread as to just what is a pudding.
Oh great, that only narrows it down to the last millennium or so, and the meat of nearly every beast, fish, and fowl.
So… Scotland?
Edit: I say! With these comments, I’m really being taken on a grand tour!
I can’t guarantee it isn’t any or all of those.
THAT’S WHAT’S SO FUCKING FRUSTRATING!
I’M PRETTY SURE IT’S ALL OF THESE! AND ALSO MORE THINGS!
The only one I know is the Christmas cake they agreed was so terrible they simply set it on fire.
I’m relatively certain that was the plot of a Hercule Poirot Christmas story told by Agatha Christie
Yep:
Pudding is dessert.
So it’s what you posted, plus every other sweet treat you might have after your tea.
What’s a yorkshire pudding?
Tea being a code word for dinner, which probably does not involve any tea.
OK, but that leaves open everything the British might classify as “dessert”, which could be literally anything, including everything I listed previously
Having lived here for the better part of a decade…they keep trying to deport them. I always like to say that the US kept all the worst bits of being British.
Well, it’s their business to know what you like doing in the privacy of a bedroom. Knowing is nothing at all like not knowing. The impacts on society are totally different.
The way I read it is that possession of the material is illegal, not sharing or recording. Possession. In Denmark possession of CSAM was made illegal and it lead to police being forced to prosecute people who accidentally uncovered CSAM and wanted to report it. I haven’t heard of specific cases, but if you want to report existence of CSAM on a CD that is in your hands which you found in the attic of a home you just moved into the police will tell you to destroy it immediately and forget about it because the law can’t distinguish between the owner of the CSAM and the current temporary person that possesses it and reports it. The UK law sounds like it will create the same issue (not that I am arguing that consensual BDSM = CSAM. Far from it. I just fear the consequences could be transferrable to this law and outlawing possession of bits and bytes is always a problem).
I btw couldn’t find face sitting on the list of outlawed kinks, so those who are into that are safe for now.
what’s odd is that creation or sharing is only possible with possession. seems like that’s why the used that word/concept on its own?
there’s websites that are deleting face sitting as it’s unclear if it can be legally viewed as suffocation, so it’s a classic morality law that uses vague language to get broad self censorship happening.
The vagueness is absolutely a problem and in morality laws might even be an intended side effect.
This source though interprets it differently saying that having a hand at the throat without actual choking isn’t covered but do note the keyword seems to be is splattered all over the page. (PS. The page is SFW but I don’t know about the rest of the site).
No matter what this is an inch away from being a straight up though police law.
it’s not intended as a side effect, it’s a very well known tactic in law writing that goes back to some of the earliest laws humans ever made, the point of vauge language in law is to have wider appeal, and to claim arbitrary power by the law giver.
edit: just adding that part of that arbitrary power is getting people to behave in extreme ways outside of the scope of the legal system ‘just in case’. so, people deleting face sitting porn to comply with ‘no strangulation’ even though there’s no language to explicitly say so, and no legal reason to do so.
In Denmark possession of CSAM was made illegal and it lead to police being forced to prosecute people who accidentally uncovered CSAM and wanted to report it. I haven’t heard of specific cases, but if you want to report existence of CSAM on a CD that is in your hands which you found in the attic of a home you just moved into the police will tell you to destroy it immediately and forget about it because the law can’t distinguish between the owner of the CSAM and the current temporary person that possesses it and reports it.
The fuuuuuck? Even in america, the stars would have to align for that to happen. The cop would have to dislike you, the prosecutor would have to dislike you (or be gunning for a higher political position and you’re an easy mark for being tough on child criminals), the jury would have to hate you (or be really dumb and not believe you took the material to the cops in the first place), AND you would have to be dumb enough to not realize how hated you are in your local area and still give them the rope to hang you with.
It’s nonsense.
See for example the Danish “Operation Umbrella” where more than 1000 cases of possession of CSAM were prosecuted because a video of two fifteen year olds had been shared around on FB messenger.
Those who had received and opened it did not get punished. Those who had passed it on or requested it did.
Perfectly sensible.
Do you have any documentation for these claims about Danish law? They don’t match e.g. the rulings in the big Umbrella case from some years ago.
No it’s anecdotal. Someone told me they discovered CSAM on second hand hardware and that was what they were told when they reported it. Umbrella just shows the incompetence of the police, this case shows the incompetence of the law. Doesn’t matter if anyone got jailed because of it, the fear is enough to not report CSAM.
Because historically that always goes well.
/S
The govt really shouldn’t open up that can of worms.
Because who can resist an open can of worms 🤤😏
DEATH BY SNU SNU!
We need rest. The spirit is willing, but the flesh is spongy and bruised.
What about goblin totem poles
Bruh you made me remember this fever dream of a fucking episode
They were all fever dreams
True, but this one was one i remember being especially trippy i think
Is this classed as “ass smothering” or “jeans facesitting”?
Yes
With a side of sploshing it looks like.
I think that’s what they call it when there’s food involved.
Nah, he plausibly can breath so it’s okay, if I understand the stupid bill’s logic.
“What if the half-pints (who shouldn’t be on those soites without a porno loicense anyway!) learn the wrong way to have a mad hatter!”
he couldn’t breathe a moment ago when he had a pot of honey stuck on his head
makes ya think
They should ban the one with the dog instead
Sometimes it’s ok to feel the big feelings, actually.
True, but there’s also a reason trigger warnings exist. I’m still bitter about it.
Fair.
You monster, I just stopped crying over Seymour
I thought she had some weird long feet before I zoomed in.
Dude, you can’t take leelas boots off.
Serious sweaty boot rash
*tentacle rash
From the thumbnail, I thought Leela had a freakishly long foot for a second.
And?
