• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    That Hakeem guy feels snakelike but is he a snake for good or evil? Maybe it’s time for a clean slate going forward. Now is the time.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      Hey, if he can deliver on the mandate Democrats received in this election, and is willing to deliver, and does deliver, then the measure will be in Democrats’ ability to mobilize voters again in 2028.

      If he can, will, and does do that, then I will happily admit I was wrong about him.

      We shall see.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Just saw a young turks cast where they were going ballistic over this. Too ballistic.

    There needs to be a specific name put forward, and then a 2nd name after they refuse. Abdul put forward a name for Senate. Van Hollan. There is support for them. I’d put Chris Murphy up too, or Bernie. But being livid without supporting/nominating any single soul is just programming you/us for frustration.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      TYT is way too reactionary. Ana’s “birthing person” crashout was absolutely insane, and doubling down on it even more so. The fact that they still style themselves as progressives is laughable.

    • VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Disagree that it’s on the people to put another name forward, or that would be an elected position by the people.

      People are saying “no not this because X, Y, Z. Find someone better who doesn’t have those traits. Do you job and represent the electorate by picking the appropriate individual.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yeah I agree. Whenever I encourage people to contact their representatives, I say they should mention who they would like to see instead.

      I’ve got a few choices I’d like to see. Everyone else can have theirs. If enough reps hear the same names again and again, they’ll see who has popular support

  • GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I’m not American so please take that into account, but my perception of the dems is they have a listening problem, both internally and externally. They can’t seem to keep their ears on the ground.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      That’s because the establishment wing of the party since Bill Clinton’s time has actually been fiscally conservative.

      So they don’t listen to the people’s cries when they beg for progress. Because progressivism here is the closest thing we have to social democracy. And yet they get derided as “far-left” 🙄… Please.

      The actual far-left calls even progressives “centrists.” But there is no actual far-left in US politics; that only exists among edge lords and keyboard warriors on the fringes of the internet.

  • DragonAce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Fuck Jeffries and Schumer, both of those fuckers are selfish assholes who just want to go back to the status quo so they can keep collecting their bribes in peace.

  • Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Signed. These politicians either like the pac’s values or they break their own, and either way shows no integrity. Do better!

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    He represents AIPAC and AIPAC won the majority so I guess it makes sense that he is the speaker of the genocide supporting majority

    • Audacious@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      I saw that half circle infographic with colored dots showing the distribution of party members, but this one had AIPAC in black dots. Currently there 231 AIPAC seats to 164 independent democrats, 11 independent republicans, and 25 uncalled (idk what that means). It really showed how the real distribution of power is in the House, and why none of the problems are going to get fixed. AIPAC party members control the majority still.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Uncalled means they’re still counting ballots.

        But yeah I’ve seen that graphic for the previous session but I haven’t seen one yet for the next one. Do you mind linking it?

        This just tells us what our work is for the next primary season though. We’re taking chunks out of the AIPAC biparty. Just need to keep biting off forkfulls until it’s enough to make a difference.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yerp, a Schumer/Jeffries leadership would mean more AIPAC-funded status quo and “across the aisle” appeasement/compromise.

      When will they learn that there’s no compromising with fascism?

      • Formfiller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        They’re not compromising with fascists because they are also fascists. They just think the killing, mass surveillance, genocide, undermining democracy, taking bribes, insider trading, war profiteering, attacks on civil liberties, for profit concentration camps and police militarization should be done more quietly

        • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          And thus, why the only real solution is becoming armed and organized. Either they end up fearing us enough to make changes, or we realize our own power as a populace and make those changes by force.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Somehow, I don’t think either Jeffries or Schumer can count on repub AIPAC votes to help them.

    • Garfunkel@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      The reach of israel in american politics is insane. Forget the fact that tiktok is owned by an israeli billionaire. Zohran endorsed Jefferies and now Mamdani has been acting weird endorsing it and doing nothing when he promised to arrest nethanyahu for his war crimes.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Zohran endorsed Jefferies

        Is that true? I can’t find any sources on that outside of newsweek and politico. Got anything that isn’t a reactionary right-wing rag?

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          59 seconds ago

          Here is a clip posted by Forbes which has his full, unedited answer to the question, from a few months ago.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Trump wasn’t listening. Now the democrats aren’t listening. Shall we ler them hear us next week at the street side demonstrations?

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sure, feel free to organize demonstrations. That might convince them to choose other leadership. As well as contacting your representatives of course.

      Don’t claim they aren’t listening though. Some may be deaf, but others hear. Politics is about numbers. So don’t give up without trying.