Trumps name appears in the Epstein files more then Harry Potters names appears in all 7 Harry Potter books.
- No Harris
- No Biden
- No Obama
- No Sanders
But mUh bOth sIdEs amirite.
Trans people are mentioned in the emails, but it’s mostly disgusting chaser shit
So the Italian film, “Saló or the 120 Days of Sodom”, turns out to be correct about the fascists, even if the director, Pier Paolo Pasolini, said it was a metaphor. He was believed to have been killed by fascists because of the director’s anti-fascism.
This is wrong. Epstein had an email discussing MTF porn and noting the lack of FTM porn out there and considers grooming young boys to be transition to become a new product category for him.
This is not a joke, by the way.
Yep I remember seeing this too. You can probably quickly find it in jmail.
I’m gonna need a source for that because whatthefuck
Forgive me but I don’t feel like rereading it lol
It was on that community cataloging a posting a bunch of the emails (with links)
@betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world posted the link elsewhere in this thread:
Do you really want to find out?
Off with their heads!
According to the Google, and I’m not going to search further despite knowing it’s unreliable, the number for Bill Clinton is about 50 times. Just because the OP didn’t mention him, and also because that’s rookie numbers. Even when you include Trump sucking Bubba’s dick.
To be fair Epstein did talk about forcing transition on young boys and raising them as sex slaves. And he was 100% a chaser which came up many times. But trans people were never mentioned as perpetrators of abuse only as victims.
just like trans people been saying for decades
Yes, we have.
Yup, the “democrats are forcibly transitioning your kids” conspiracy theories that conservatives parrot has 100% been coming from the fact that the billionaires wanted to do exactly that. They wanted to forcibly transition children to keep as sex slaves.
There are multiple documents in the files confirming this… They even go on to justify it by saying that they’d be doing the children a service, because it would allow them to make more money as prostitutes or porn stars after they’re too old for Epstein’s clients.
There’s a weird branch of conservatism that is really into forced feminization as a kink. That’s why trans women are vilified, but femboys are somehow okay with many conservatives. To the conservatives who are into forced feminization, the femboy is just playing into that kink, and they can tell themselves that it’s forced. They don’t see it as gay, (which would be wrong, as conservatives hate the evil gays), because it’s forcing someone to be feminine instead. But trans women take it too far for those conservatives, because it removes the “I’m forcing them to do this by being more masculine” power dynamic that they enjoy with forced feminization. With trans women, it’s very clearly something that they’re doing to themselves, not something that is being forced upon them.
But with the billionaires, that latter part isn’t a problem. They literally could force kids to be trans. So it just plays even harder into the forced feminization kink that so many conservatives have… It’s the natural end stage of the kink for them. Trans girls don’t break their illusion of power, because the power is not an illusion when you’re that rich.
The all-time masters of child rape: the aristocrats!
Remember when the Clinton’s were accused of running an underground pedophile ring at a pizza shop in DC? Turns out that wasn’t true.
It’s always the guys you suspect the most.
So, can we hunt pedos yet? Like a reverse most dangerous game?
Only the rich. Multimillionaires and higher. Anyone under that is basically a victim of the system too
Nah fuck that, rich people are just worth more points
Wait, poor pedos are the victims?
Pedophiles? Victims or people in need of treatment. Pedocriminals? Perpetrators, and society needs to be protected from them, but still in need of treatment.
Poor pedos don’t blackmail powerful people into getting out of jail, so the justice system is usually enough in those cases.
I’m sorry, but that’s naive. There are some pedos that are only in it for themselves, and only present a danger to the children within arms reach, but there are many more who are selling their own children as well as the children of others and are actively involved in trades/sales with other pedos, as well as being involved with and protected by various forms of organized crime in their own areas.
There are pedos who adopt for the purpose of selling (prostituting) the child, for example, and even more who operate out of group homes. There are also subcategories of pedos: for example, you have pedos that want Alice-in-Wonderland lookalikes and you have sadist pedos that want to be able to punch and cut while they rape. For every adult kink, there is a pedo kink, and more.
The lone pedo doing it in the home for his own gratification is just the tip of the iceberg, but many more operate in groups and they’d very much like for you to carry on believing that they do not exist. This is trafficking. It happens everywhere. It is not rare.
What being rich does for pedos like Epstein and Trump, the local group does for the “poor” pedos, but it’s the exact same thing.
And the justice system doesn’t do jack shit.
There’s a huge difference about the way the media is reporting the horrific information uncovered in these files.
Independent media, who are having to read the files themselves and view the images and the videos, you can just see that they are damaged by that information because it’s so disturbing. And the vast amount of it is so overwhelming. You can see that they’re upset by it.
But when you watch the mainstream media, the “Reporters” aren’t really directly reading or viewing any of the file information. They’re just getting a summary from somebody else in their organization who’s reading it for them. And so they can report it very disinterested. They’re actually downplaying it. It makes you think they seem more professional, but it’s just because reporters in the mainstream media are not actually looking at all this awful stuff, and if they did, I think they would be reporting it much more accurately as the devastating and horrible thing it really is.
Yes. For example, I read in The Guardian that Richard Branson was mentioned, but they only really talked about his vast apology and the million different ways he did not have anything to do with Epstein’s real activity or knowledge of it, etc.
Then I saw the actual content of the emails where Richard Branson was offering Epstein direct advice on how to rehabilitate his public image after finishing his sentence, and how sorry he was for Epstein.
It’s such a disparity between the reporting and the reality I don’t think it can legitimately be called reporting.
And it appears the incriminating stuff is all redacted anyway. There is nothing reported yet about actual rapes of underage girls even though that’s what this was all about. Using protecting the girls’ identities and active investigatioins as an excuse they just cut the entire evidence of the rapes out of the material it appears.
So the media has an easy out, just reporting on who talked to epstein, who went to a party, and nothing of the details of these rapes, even as those details wouldn’t identify anyone to any person that doesn’t already know about it.
We need an independent monitor to decide what to release or not. If only we could leak the files, news organizations could decide what to redact, I would trust a number of them keeping each other honest far more than the government.
Bill Gates asking Epstein for antibiotics he can slip to his wife without her knowing because he got STDs while on the island should really be a bigger story, even from a popculture gossip standpoint.
I totally forgot about about that, what was it syphilis? Probably had something to do with his divorce I imagine. Giving your wife underage human trafficking syphilis Seems like a real last straw.
The Tennessee holler is doing the good work.
That’s not true. Trans people are mentioned. Not by name, but rather how to design perfect sex slaves by transitioning people.
I fucking hate that no matter what happens, everything involving trans people somehow comes back to harm us. This is why they’ve been screaming “protect the children”, because the only way they can visualize trans children is as sex slaves. These people do not belong in civilized society
Enslaving people is basically normal capitalism, sex slave children is just a natural extension. And may I say it’s a blessing that this platform let’s me say that.
I believe the context was more forcibly transitioning children.
I feel silly saying this, but linked source please?
Agreed, I already know Trump was frequently mentioned and Epstein’s buddy for 20 years, and I still want a source for this.
If it was true, I think the Democrats would have released the files long ago.
Of course, Clinton was also friends with Trump for years. but for 50 mentions vs. 38K, it seems like it would be worth the reveal to them.
On other hand, the Royal Family is also working hard to subvert these revelations, and God knows how many billionaire “donators” to bOtH pArTiEs… this is big, biggest political story of any of our lifetimes in my opinion
I know someone already showed a screenshot but I also want to mention it is file EFTA01013384 if you want to search for it in the Epstein Library.
Thanks for the direct link!
It was an email that was posted yesterday or maybe before that. I’ll see if I can find it.
🤢 I almost regret asking, thank you for providing
Its a good thing to have read it and be aware of it.
At the same time I wish I had never read that.
Just fucking monsters.
Well that’s enough internet for one day
You got it. You’re a superstar. I was looking and having trouble finding it myself because there’s 10 million Epstein posts.
Wait, seriously?
We live in terrible and stupid times.
