• verdare@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Agreed. Honestly believe that no one is truly entirely hetero or homosexual. I mean, either of those existing is predicated on the existence of a strict gender binary. If gender is a spectrum, sexuality necessarily has to be as well.

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Wholly agree, it’s a spectrum. I’m het, but that’s just a shorthand convenience label that says I’m for the most part attracted to people that don’t look like me, even if it’s not particularly useful or necessarily true, but I don’t think it’s a bad word if it’s helping express something I like.

      When I do think it’s an awful word is when it’s used to restrict someone’s freedom in choosing a partner, or forcing someone’s view of themselves into a black and white stereotype, so it’s a rather loaded word at this point.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s just so simplistic and limiting for there to be words that treat attraction like a fixed trait. I’ve got to be straight, gay, bi, or some global descriptor for my own behaviour? That sucks.

        Like maybe I’m straight, but in a “knows when dudes are hot and comfortable at kink parties” way, you know? There’s no word that doesn’t lump me in with loads of people I have nothing in common with.

        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Like maybe I’m straight, but in a “knows when dudes are hot and comfortable at kink parties” way, you know

          I’m throwing you in the “fun people” pile, so there’s another label ;)