• ChanchoManco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    So? That’s whataboutism. We know there’s been a lot of wrongdoings over the history. This doesn’t take away to the fact that Iranians are being killed because of religion reasons right now.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Oh ok, you want to be treated like an adult? Fine. Stop saying disrespectful childish things like “sky daddies” because it makes you seem like an immature edgelord.

      • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        He is not saying “I want to be treated like an adult”. He’s saying “your position contains a fatal logical flaw”. Which you did not address, and instead proceeded to get your panties all twisted in a bunch.

        Soooooo, who’s the childish one again?

        • just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Marxism describes religion as a reaction to oppression hence Marxist in non-marxist system tends to support religious minorities. However, once marxists system is implemented, religious people become a counter point to utopia because their very existence proves that oppression still exists.

          This means the number of atheists in a post marxist society actually becomes a success metric. This should explain all 3 mentioned wiki links.

          • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            12 hours ago

            You still have not addressed his actual point. You are just whining about him not using your preferred nomenclature.

            • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              12 hours ago

              I don’t have to. I want to play edgy time. Why can he say “sky daddies” but I can’t say “the cambodian genocide had a horrifying atheism motivated aspect?”

              • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                12 hours ago

                You can. He says that it’s not relevant. Now you tell him why he’s wrong. You don’t whine because he’s disrespectful.

                • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Now you tell him why he’s wrong.

                  he’s wrong because he’s edgy, and the discussion on his points have been done for centuries by better people than me.

                  • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    12 hours ago

                    You know, you can just say “I refuse to engage with your obvious rage bait”.

                    But he’s not wrong because he’s edgy. He’s wrong because he’s wrong. Or not. As the case might be.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Is “jealous genocider who condones slavery and thinks women should shut the fuck up” a more accurate descriptor?

        Like are you sure you want to get into it about how awful your god is?